Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-07-2002, 01:11 PM   #2
Mike McCarty Mike McCarty is offline
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR
SOG Member
'03 Finalist Taos SOPA
'03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA
'03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA
'04 Finalist Taos SOPA
 
Mike McCarty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
Quote:
I used to assume from context that folks said "painterly" when they meant "loose" or "impressionistically" or -- now that "blended" has already become a suspect methodology (so much for the resurgence of classical realism) -- "highly finished." (I confess to not being able to understand why one methodology or technique is "painterly" and another not. We're all just smearing paint around, right?)
I have always understood the term to mean "in a loose or impressionistic fashion" leaving brush strokes as a bonus and not a flaw. This would seem to rule out the "highly blended" works as painterly... Where I received this understanding I have no idea. I always thought it was just part of the code, the art speak code. I don't think, however, that it would be fair to suggest that a painterly manner was not a highly finished manner. As to the origins of the word "painterly" I don't have a clue.
__________________
Mike McCarty
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.