Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Portrait World News
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-22-2008, 11:17 AM   #2
Alexandra Tyng Alexandra Tyng is offline
UNVEILINGS MODERATOR
Juried Member
 
Alexandra Tyng's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Narberth, PA
Posts: 2,485
I thought the article looked at the issue from different sides and presented a relatively unbiased view of the subject, considering that the readership is the general public. It is easy to see how people would question spending what seem to be large outlays of money for portraits when photographs are available. Art is considered a luxury by many, even by the same people who appreciate it and are inspired by it. So in these tough economic times, the issue of money is bound to be raised.

I noticed a couple of issues that the writer was probably unaware of. One is that, as younger and talented artists come into the market, prices become competitive. This happens repeatedly in waves. I would imagine that those at the "top" of the field financially would enjoy riding the crest of the wave for a while--until it breaks and a new wave comes along. Once the new artists flood the market with high quality art, people catch on and it is harder and harder for the "top" artists to get commissions at a very high price. It's just the way of the world. I think it is easy for artists to out-price themselves if they think things are always going to be the same or better. So some of the price confusion that was discussed in the article relates to this, and that is why there is disagreement over the definition of a "cheap" portrait. Some people care about reputation and quality, others about reputation only, and others care more about getting high quality for less money.

The other issue I noticed, reading between the lines, is a lack of understanding of how artists are commissioned vs. how government jobs are awarded. Reading the article, someone might get the impression that something fishy was going on, that artists were being awarded favors, because no bidding had occurred! I thought this was amusing, but a little frustrating, too, because the author of the article didn't take the time to explain how art is commissioned.

It was really nice to see Joy Thomas mentioned, and Michele Rushworth (though not by name). There were a few other familiar names, and maybe other forum members, too. Exciting!
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blake Gopnik trashes official portraits in Washington Post article Thomas Nash Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth 40 07-21-2005 04:12 AM
Using attachment to post an image Cynthia Daniel Introduction & Orientation 2 02-12-2002 11:02 PM
HOW TO USE ATTACHMENT TO POST AN IMAGE Cynthia Daniel Animal Critiques 2 02-12-2002 11:02 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.