Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Resource Photo Critiques


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 07-16-2004, 06:50 PM   #1
Mary Sparrow Mary Sparrow is offline
EDUCATIONAL MODERATOR
Juried Member
 
Mary Sparrow's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,120
Send a message via ICQ to Mary Sparrow



For the record, I don't have a clue why they look so fuzzy now, they were clear as a bell before I resized to upload.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2004, 06:59 PM   #2
Joan Breckwoldt Joan Breckwoldt is offline
Associate Member
 
Joan Breckwoldt's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 504
Photos

Hi Mary,

I will offer you my opinion for what it's worth, I too am working hard on trying to get good resource photos. But maybe my fresh eyes can help you.

I don't think there are enough shadows, enough value contrast, in the second and third photos. I have learned that when I take a photo outside, the sun is so bright from all over that it's hard to get good shadows. Plus, the sunlight washes out the lit side of the face.

You have a lot of value contrast in the first photo. Though from what I've read it is difficult to paint with that backlighting, but why not give it a try? I think it's difficult because basically the whole face is in shadow. From my recent look at your website I think you could do it! Chris Saper does this a lot, you might look at her book.

Could you take pictures of this cute little guy with a more defined light source? For example, light coming in from a window? Otherwise I would go with the first one.

Hope this helps,

Joan
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2004, 07:55 PM   #3
Mary Sparrow Mary Sparrow is offline
EDUCATIONAL MODERATOR
Juried Member
 
Mary Sparrow's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,120
Send a message via ICQ to Mary Sparrow
OK, so...how about these? I only have a couple hundred from which to choose.
Attached Images
     
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2004, 08:20 PM   #4
Mike McCarty Mike McCarty is offline
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR
SOG Member
'03 Finalist Taos SOPA
'03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA
'03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA
'04 Finalist Taos SOPA
 
Mike McCarty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
Mary,

If I were given the first bunch of three I would loose numbers two and three. The first one has interesting lighting. His expression is a little smerky but it may be dead on for him, I can't make that call. I would make an attempt to loose the hands completely and drop them to his side. You could try this on the computer and see what if.

Of the second three, the last one gets tossed. The indoor shot was beginning to develop some good light, but the arm up and the expression don't do him any favors.

I think you could turn the second one into a nice painting. Cute expression, interesting light. I would choose this one of the ones you've shown.
__________________
Mike McCarty
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2004, 08:25 PM   #5
Joan Breckwoldt Joan Breckwoldt is offline
Associate Member
 
Joan Breckwoldt's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 504
Cute boy!

Hi Mary,

Wow, these are great. Is this your son? He can't take a bad picture! I think, in my limited experience, that any of these would be much easier to paint from mainly because there is more variation in the values. I really like his expression in the second one, though any one of them would make a darling portrait.

As an afterthought, I couldn't see enough dark values in those two I mentioned in your first post, but that might just be my monitor.

Joan
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2004, 09:36 PM   #6
Mary Sparrow Mary Sparrow is offline
EDUCATIONAL MODERATOR
Juried Member
 
Mary Sparrow's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,120
Send a message via ICQ to Mary Sparrow
Ok, let's look at a couple more if you don't mind.

Mike, the mom actually mentioned she wouldn't mind catching his smirk.

Joan, I am afraid I can't lay claim to anyone that blonde.
Attached Images
   
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2004, 09:49 PM   #7
Mike McCarty Mike McCarty is offline
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR
SOG Member
'03 Finalist Taos SOPA
'03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA
'03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA
'04 Finalist Taos SOPA
 
Mike McCarty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
I would nix both of these.

In the first one you could get much better results if you would back him away from the window and turn him toward the light. Your first window light attempt above was much closer.
__________________
Mike McCarty
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2004, 09:54 PM   #8
Joan Breckwoldt Joan Breckwoldt is offline
Associate Member
 
Joan Breckwoldt's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 504
Mom input

Mary, I agree with Mike about these two. The poses in the first two batches were better, in my opinion, I would choose one of those.

Will you choose the ones you think are good and then show those photos to the mom? I'm curious how this part of the process goes for you.

Joan
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2004, 07:17 AM   #9
Mary Sparrow Mary Sparrow is offline
EDUCATIONAL MODERATOR
Juried Member
 
Mary Sparrow's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,120
Send a message via ICQ to Mary Sparrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike McCarty
.

.... if you would back him away from the window and turn him toward the light. Your first window light attempt above was much closer.
Hey Mike, I totally understand what you are saying now I need to understand the magic spell?

I know most of you shy away from very young children simply because of some of the problems that you face trying to get resource photos. Well, that isn't an option for me, I truly LOVE paiting those pudgy little people and am not going to stop. But as I was reading your above statement my brain flashed to the moment I was taking those indoor shots. By that time we had gotten to that window ANY thought of getting him to pose where I wanted him to was a joke, so we basically bribed him to stay in that general area and shot away while he talked our ears off about various important issues.

Small children move around so fast, that being methodical and posing them while looking for the perfect lighting conditions is next to impossible b/c as soon as you think you have it they see something better a foot over and bam..your perfect picture is gone.

So what do you you do? What, if any, steps can be taken by people like me that are going to take this task on?.

Once a child is 5-6 or so, they are more patient and cooperative making it easier to pose them..(of course then, the new issue is getting a NATURAL expression on their face instead of CHEEZ).

Maybe this is a question for the creativity issues section?
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ben and Samantha Michele Rushworth Oil Critiques 36 09-01-2003 08:51 PM
Ben "The Painter" Elizabeth Schott Portrait Unveilings, All Medium- Moderators: A. Tyng & C. Saper 21 06-14-2003 05:56 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.