Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Oil Critiques


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 10-03-2004, 06:47 PM   #1
Michele Rushworth Michele Rushworth is offline
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
Michele Rushworth's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460



The subject in your painting looks many years older than the photograph. This is a common difficulty when painting children. The vertical dimensions, especially of the lower face, need to be very carefully observed. If these areas are too tall compared to the various widths of things, as they have been painted here, then you put years onto the age of the child. She looks like a teenager in the painting, I think.

I also agree with Scott that this is not a photo that will help you learn much or help you create a good portfolio piece. I understand that it is being done as a favor for a friend, though.
__________________
Michele Rushworth
www.michelerushworth.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2004, 07:25 PM   #2
Leslie Bohoss Leslie Bohoss is offline
Associate Member
 
Leslie Bohoss's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 204
Michele ,

Yes , Right! I did this one by sight sizing from a print. (it is a relative small painting, an A4 size did it)

Why happens always the same with me? I did a good, measured(!) sketch on panel. After 3 sessions is many points are off ! It makes me crazy. Am I too hurry? I think so. Hot-headed as me is not good for painting. lol

I see the perfect paintings here, they are extraordinarily accurate. I should be do it without Photoshop and Co. isn't?

Many thanks for advise!
Leslie.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2004, 08:50 PM   #3
Julie Deane Julie Deane is offline
Juried Member
 
Julie Deane's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 1,298
Measurements

Hi Leslie -

I can relate. I think any time we add paint over a sketch it tends to go off from the original measurements. That is my constant struggle and I've read similar comments online at this site. I've read people commenting on their work, and they frequently mention "re-stating" their work. In plain talk, that means they realize that the painting's proportions are now incorrect and they have to correct it.

I am in the midst of such a struggle now. I have let the work dry and then I took a tracing from my exact size photo and laid it over my painting. I now can take note of all the things that have drifted and need "re-stating".
__________________
Julie Deane
www.discerningeyeportraits.com
Member of Merit, Portrait Society of Atlanta
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2004, 03:34 PM   #4
Leslie Bohoss Leslie Bohoss is offline
Associate Member
 
Leslie Bohoss's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 204
Hi Julie,

Not only my problem? Puhh. Good to know.

The idea with tracing paper is useful, like the upside down by Scott. I know this Photoshop layering trick, but I used it very rarely. Mostly I paint (since reading about it, by Steven Sweeney) with the sight size methode. Because it is the best and the only one that works in live too. (in case I doing a good live painting/drawing in the future) Recently, I constructed a control tool that must be help during the painting process, but I didn't tested yet. If it works, I post it with photos. (I'm a kind of "tool time" guys.... )

The question always in my mind: does it really help or even contrary.

I'm sure your painting comes very good!

Thank you and Ciao!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2004, 12:37 PM   #5
Leslie Bohoss Leslie Bohoss is offline
Associate Member
 
Leslie Bohoss's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 204
Hello,

I've changed all things what I can. Is it better now? Is she still older than 7-8 ? (The girl is now 10 years old, not 7, my mistake)
Sorry for the bad shot.
The last painting from bad reference photo, really.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2004, 06:07 PM   #6
Julie Deane Julie Deane is offline
Juried Member
 
Julie Deane's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 1,298
Value check

Hi Leslie -

I can tell you've been working hard. It has definitely improved.
This is a tough photo to work from, however. She really does have different sized eyes, for instance. I guess she has a mannerism in which one eye squints more than the other.

I am still bothered by her mouth and chin, especially on her right side (our left). That side of the face appears to drift too far to the side, making her look unsymmetrical.

Also, are your values accurately portrayed online? The values in the painting seem to be overly contrasted, at least on my monitor. I see a lot of cool, very subtle, tone variations in the photo that I don't see in the painting at the moment.
__________________
Julie Deane
www.discerningeyeportraits.com
Member of Merit, Portrait Society of Atlanta
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 04:22 PM   #7
Leslie Bohoss Leslie Bohoss is offline
Associate Member
 
Leslie Bohoss's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 204
Hello Julie

Thanks for your comments!

I've painted new almost all parts. I think now I'm a little step forwards. I was unhappy with skintones.
To values: I thought, the flash made the face too flat, so I gave more contrast to achieve 3D forms. And I wanted a very warm image.
Here is night, the reality is more better as this shot.

Thank you for your helps!
Ciao!
Attached Images
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.