Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Oil Critiques
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 06-10-2005, 07:52 PM   #1
Michele Rushworth Michele Rushworth is offline
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
Michele Rushworth's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460



I agree with Sharon, one light source (and windows are a light source) will make your life so much easier and result in a more three dimensional painting.
__________________
Michele Rushworth
www.michelerushworth.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2005, 12:36 AM   #2
Dianne Gardner Dianne Gardner is offline
Juried Member
FT Professional
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 208
Send a message via Yahoo to Dianne Gardner
Thanks for the additional critique Sharon and Michele.

It was done as a group session.

Yes lighting is a problem as my studio has a very large skylight. The sun passes so quickly over the skylight that it makes it difficult to grab the shadows. Therefore I began using a lamp. But we still get that sun from the skylight.

So do you think I should forgo the daylight lamp on the model and just depend on the skylight?

Thank you.
Dianne
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2005, 12:47 AM   #3
Marcus Lim Marcus Lim is offline
Juried Member
Finalist, Int'l Salon 2006
 
Marcus Lim's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 324
Send a message via ICQ to Marcus Lim
question of perspective

Hi Dianne,
On top of Sharon and Michele's advice, you may like to look at the issue on perspectives. The way i see this portrait is a slight forward hunch by the model. As a result, certain features of her head and body are subjected to perspective. I hope it makes sense to you.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Marcus Lim
Historian Painter, Singapore
Facebook Page
www.marcuslim.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2005, 01:00 AM   #4
Dianne Gardner Dianne Gardner is offline
Juried Member
FT Professional
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 208
Send a message via Yahoo to Dianne Gardner
perspective

Thank you Marcus for the observation on perspective and for your help. You are absolutely right.

However, I took the photograph after I painted the painting. The model was not hunched over but rather sitting quite erect when were were working. I only used the photo for some detail work on her face. It is not a reference photo.

I do appreciate your help.

Dianne
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2005, 06:40 AM   #5
Marcus Lim Marcus Lim is offline
Juried Member
Finalist, Int'l Salon 2006
 
Marcus Lim's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 324
Send a message via ICQ to Marcus Lim
Oh i'm really sorry...i didn't know that was the case.
__________________
Marcus Lim
Historian Painter, Singapore
Facebook Page
www.marcuslim.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2005, 08:09 AM   #6
Sharon Knettell Sharon Knettell is offline
Approved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,730
Dianne,

Studio lighting is a rather complex issue.

I don't know where the skylight is vis-a-vis the model. Check out the book I told you about to help you resolve your lighting isuues.

If it is not a constant light source it is unworkable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2005, 07:03 PM   #7
Dianne Gardner Dianne Gardner is offline
Juried Member
FT Professional
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 208
Send a message via Yahoo to Dianne Gardner
Thank you

Sharon, I am ordering the book as soon as possible. I'm looking forward to reading it.

Marcus, please don't apologize. You didn't know and the information you gave me is valuable.

Best regards
Dianne
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2005, 11:58 PM   #8
Alexandra Tyng Alexandra Tyng is offline
UNVEILINGS MODERATOR
Juried Member
 
Alexandra Tyng's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Narberth, PA
Posts: 2,485
Dianne,

I really like this painting. It's true that simpler lighting would make the three-dimentional effect more convincing and easier to achieve. But I find the pattern of light and shadow on the model's face interesting.

There are two main issues that stand out for me.

1) The left side of the model's mouth (right side of painting) seems stretched out, and so does her entire jaw on that side. Of course this is just compared to the way she looks in the photo.

2) The background is distracting, especially the light, jagged shape in the top right. It actually breaks up into pieces that do not all read as being background. I would suggest you try for a more unified background, especially since her face is full of pattern.

I think you have done an excellent job under challenging lighting conditions.

Alex
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Preparatory color study from life Marvin Mattelson Exercises and Challenges 8 08-20-2008 01:23 AM
Portraits v. Landscape v. Still Life? Karin Wells Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth 188 06-29-2005 08:06 PM
Drawing from Life Nathan Cremer Open Studio 13 04-09-2003 09:25 PM
Consider the source John Zeissig Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth 36 11-29-2002 01:17 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.